INX InTuition

Background: As the LMS System does not utilise role start date/commencement date etc. for the showing of training required within the LMS. We, like many other clients, need to create/manage multiple induction/site roles within InTuition and then manage the allocation of and ceasing of induction roles, then allocate an operational role PURELY to control what you see in the LMS. This is a significant waste of time, due to: • The effort required to create/manage additional roles; • The additional effort from an admin perspective ceasing induction and reallocation of operational roles; and • Degraded application performance of the role status tabs within a person profile due to large number of requirements across multiple roles. Request for Change: As per screenshot below – I believe the whole process can be solved if we were able to introduce a “Training Required Prior to Start Date?” (or something similar), which uses the role start date as a key date. • If the checkbox is ticked, then the user will see that training in LMS (if there is a corresponding course…). • If the checkbox is unticked, the user will not see the training course in LMS UNTIL on or after the role start date. This would be relevant in all three areas – Compliances, Competencies and Procedures. If we can minimise the number of training for new starters, it will be excellent… As mentioned above – this will save many people a lot of time…

Ability to assign reader security level in Intuition by Employer, not just Workgroup. This will allow external contractors the ability to only see their employees not everyone assigned to a workgroup.

Enable customization of emails from InTuition to include Moodle link. Personnel are told to review a procedure, but they are directed to InTuition. We should be able to, within that email, direct them to Moodle.

Many of our theory elements for operating machinery are the same with the practical element varying. It would be good to manage equivalence to an elemental granularity in the Advanced Setting tab of Competency.

Background: In normal circumstances, a "Fitter" role is used by Employees and Contract Personnel. The issue currently is that an Employee would have company specific training, while you do not want to add this role to a Contractor - as there would be irrelevant training. This forces us to either create a "Fitter - Contractor" role (which we apply to contractors), or Add a "Employee" role, which we use to record the Employee specific requirements (and remove them from the "Fitter" Role. This is an absolute pain when it comes to any kind of matrix (or BI Report) as you now have twice as many roles as required. Request for Change: Add a multi select column into the Role CCP menus, which allows us to select which "Work Statuses" a CCP is required for. This then controls what is required, and we wont need to manage multiple roles for Employees/Contractors.

Add Group Maintenance ability into the Administration section of all INX modules. There are some current group maintenance functions that can work across all modules and some that are specific for InFlight. You could have specific ones for other modules. Example: InTuition could have renew all personnel who have a specific competency and one to renew all personnel who have a specific compliance (example is that a competency or compliance is no longer valid)

Background: currently each person compliance / competency has to be edited individual to set the flag as renewed (archived). This is very time consuming when you are 'archiving' the CC due to it not being required by the current role. Request for Change: introduce a multiple checkbox function. Similar to Maintain Role Requirements or Update Training Event.

We use InTuition to track client roles as well as our own, and they have many that have prerequisite job roles. It may only have one, or it could offer a handful of relevant prerequisites. Can something be added to denote this need and a way to identify the required role. A drop-down or a blank field would be enough, with an option to have the information shown in the search. Even just somewhere that notes/comments can be made would help.

It would be helpful to be able to see if personnel meet the minimum requirements of a role or holds more desirable qualifications, without having to go through the CCP lists. Adding optional/desirable/non-mandatory CCPs would help with this. We have a lot of roles with "nice to have" qualifications but no way to real add them to the system. The only way I can see to add them is to include them as equivalent to or exceeding the base CCP, which isn't always a true representation. It will likely also cost a lot of time as adding enough combinations of equivalent to or exceeding CPPs to the advanced details is a time consuming exercise; even more so when changes occur and they need to be amended. And that is assuming those combinations are relevant to all the roles requiring the base CCP to being with, which will likely not be the case. It also can't be seen on appointment compliancy reports as the current set up states "holds equivalence" against personnel to show a CCP they hold has an equivalent or higher, rather than what that equivalent is. It would be so much easier to be able to view optional requirements as well as mandatory.

Scheduled Training Events are not populating in the INX Calendar and needs to be updated manually by our Training Admin. INX has confirmed that this was caused by an internal issue that has been raised with Product Team. No workaround is currently available other than manually adding the training events in the calendar.