Remove from Room Function - widen search to include additional room types
unplanned - open for votes
D
Deirdre Wilcox
In SAM, when using the “Remove from Room” function via Bookings -> Search by Room – could the default be set up to try other room types if the default room type is not available? Similar to when we process a Workflow, the parameters are set up to first try NPRA rooms, followed by a set order of other room types. If this is possible, when all applicable room types are exhausted, it will then return the Failed error. Currently it is only searching by same room type of the room number entered.
Shaunette Evans
Merged in a post:
Linking 'Remove From Room' functionality with "Fill Order"
K
Kiara Nathanielsz
We currently use the fillorder parameter along side the autopickroom parameter and it's working a treat!
We are wondering what else the fill order can work along side? For example we use the "Remove From Room" option in "View Room Bookings By Room" all the time. However when the village is at capacity we are unable to move bookings due to no rooms in that room type being available. At present we change the room type of the room and try again until all bookings required to be relocated are. Essentially this is the same process the fill order does at a click of a button.
My question.... can we link fill order to this in anyway so when we "Remove From Room" the system brings the fill order into affect until there are no more rooms?!
A
Andrew Pitt
I like this idea! Even if SAM can follow the 'Fill Order'?
D
Deirdre Wilcox
Hi Shaunette :) I just realised that this CANNY is similar to one that I submitted named "Remove from Room Function - widen search to include additional room types". Should these two CANNY's be merged? Thanks, Dee
Shaunette Evans
unplanned - open for votes